본문 바로가기
Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security
MOFA
KNDA
KOREAN
Regions
Issues
Programs
Publications
Multimedia
About Us
search open
search
search close
menu
MOFA
KNDA
KOREA
Regions
Korean Peninsula
Japan
China
Asia-Pacific
Americas
Central America & South America
Europe and Eurasia
Middle East and Africa
Issues
National Security & Unification
US-China Relations
International Law
International Economy and Trade
Global Issues
Diplomatic History
Korea-China-Japan Cooperation
Indo-Pacific Strategy
Programs
Seoul Diplomacy Forum
IFANS Talks
Seoul Academy of International Law (SAIL)
Publications
IFANS Focus
IFANS PERSPECTIVES
IFANS Forecast
IFANS STUDY REPORT
Others
Past Publications
Multimedia
International Conferences
IFANS Events
IFANS Talks
IFANS Dialogue
About Us
Greetings from the IFANS Senior Executive Director
Organization
Events Calendar
Notifications
Conference Registration
IFANS in the Media
Location
close
Regions
Korean Peninsula
Japan
China
Asia-Pacific
Americas
Central America & South America
Europe and Eurasia
Middle East and Africa
Issues
National Security & Unification
US-China Relations
International Law
International Economy and Trade
Global Issues
Diplomatic History
Korea-China-Japan Cooperation
Indo-Pacific Strategy
Programs
Seoul Diplomacy Forum
IFANS Talks
Seoul Academy of International Law (SAIL)
Publications
IFANS Focus
IFANS PERSPECTIVES
IFANS Forecast
IFANS STUDY REPORT
Others
Past Publications
Multimedia
International Conferences
IFANS Events
IFANS Talks
IFANS Dialogue
About Us
Greetings from the IFANS Senior Executive Director
Organization
Notifications
Conference Registration
IFANS in the Media
Location
menu close
Publications
Seeking Recognition in Anarchy: An Identity Approach to Public Diplomacy
Taehwan KIM
Upload Date
2021-06-07
Hits
204620
facebook
twitter
kakaotalk
Email
Send Email
*
All fields are required.
*
Recipient email
*
Content address
*
Title
*
Message
Cancel
Send
Print
I. Introduction
Ⅱ. Public Diplomacy as Recognitive Practices of State/National Identity
Ⅲ. Seeking Emotional Attachments: Cultural Diplomacy
IV. Seeking Legal and Political Rights: Palestine and the European Union
V. Seeking Social Esteem: China and Middle Powers
VI. Comparative Implications
VII. Conclusions
I. Introduction
Public diplomacy has made great strides since the dawn of the 21st century and underwent significant changes both as an academic field and as a diplomatic practice. Nevertheless, in reality, it still lies in the peripheries of international relations theory and foreign policy practice. In the realm of practice, it is an undeniable reality that public diplomacy is utilized by great powers in particular to justify and legitimize their positions as they engage in geopolitical competition vying for strengthened influence, especially after the 2008 global financial crisis. Public diplomacy studies also remain focused on the self-centered instrumental approach, with few, if any, research on the relation of public diplomacy and International Relations as an academic discipline. Nor was there enough research conducted on the potential impact and role of public diplomacy in international politics.
Against this backdrop, this study raises two questions. First, what is and should be the role and function of public diplomacy in today's world, in which liberal international order is in retreat while values are increasingly bloc-ized between liberalism and counter-liberalism amid the COVID-19 pandemic crisis? Second, how can public diplomacy be incorporated into International Relations theories, based on its role in world politics? From this perspective, what should be the role and direction of Korean public diplomacy?
This study attempts to theorize public diplomacy's role in international politics, seek ways to incorporate public diplomacy into mainstream International Relations, and identify the way forward by applying it to Korea’s public diplomacy. To this end, this study will introduce an “identity approach” to re-conceptualize and theorize public diplomacy (Chapter II), compare empirical cases pertaining to different types of recognition that countries seek (Chapters III~V), and draw theoretical and practical implications from the comparative cases (Chapter VI).
* Attached the File
Download
The Full Text.pdf
Prev
UN Agenda for Digital Cooperation and Korea’s Role
Next
G7 Summit 2021 and the Post-Pandemic International Order
Prev